Collection

The Correction Overshoots

Debunking has a second error, and almost nobody guards against it.

Every file here corrects a popular claim and then stops itself from correcting too far. "A file that overcorrected into you can never see it would be making the opposite error." "Blue does not mean barren, and the file’s own framing had to be corrected on this point." "Just white sand is not wrong about the grains." "Lead did not stop being the reason for the federal presence." "Nothing here suggests geologists are baffled." The first error is believing the myth. The second is believing that disproving part of it disproves all of it, and the second is the one a confident corrector makes. Two of these files record the overshoot happening inside their own drafts and being caught. That is the argument: the correction is not automatically the truth, and a publication that only ever corrects downward will be wrong in a new direction.

8 files · in reading order

Files in The Correction Overshoots

← All collections · The archive